Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: liblicense - License for storing and retrieving license information in media files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446993 dennis@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |dennis@xxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From dennis@xxxxxxxx 2008-05-19 15:26 EST ------- Builds fine in mock rpmlint output liblicense.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib/liblicense.so liblicense.i386: E: description-line-too-long The liblicense package contains the library, bindings, CLI utilities and license files. liblicense.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense.src:40: W: unversioned-explicit-provides python-liblicense liblicense.src: E: description-line-too-long The liblicense package contains the library, bindings, CLI utilities and license files. liblicense.src: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense-cli.i386: W: no-documentation liblicense-cli.i386: E: standard-dir-owned-by-package /usr/bin liblicense-cli.i386: E: summary-too-long Simple command-line utility for examining the license in a file or setting a user preference for a default license liblicense-cli.i386: E: description-line-too-long Simple command-line utility for examining the license in a file or setting a user preference for a default license liblicense-cli.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense-debuginfo.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense-devel.i386: W: no-documentation liblicense-devel.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense-modules.i386: W: no-documentation liblicense-modules.i386: W: summary-ended-with-dot Input/output modules for accessing license metadata in various file foramts. liblicense-modules.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 liblicense-python.i386: W: no-documentation liblicense-python.i386: W: invalid-license LGPL v2.1 license should be LGPLv2 per http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#head-489bc5bbf14ecdb808316674e9fc465243c liblicense.so should be in the devel package you should use %{_bindir}/* not %{_bindir} the description lines needs to be shorter missing documentation is ok for the sub packages -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review