Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: beecrypt - An open source cryptography library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438262 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2008-05-19 00:44 EST ------- (In reply to comment #6) > (In reply to comment #5) > > * Drop the java_arches %define and %ifarch's, gcj is available on all Fedora > > supported platforms now a days > > Looks like the java package doesn't make sense at all when seeing bug #151294, > I would disable the package for the next rebuild again until situation changes. > Would this be suitable for you as well? > Given the new info disabling / removing the java sub-package is fine with me. > > * Re-enable c++ bindings, the reason to disable them (not make rpm depend upon > > libstdc++) is no longer valid, and I think that for other beecrypt users > > beecrypt requering libstdc++ is nothing but a small nuisance. > > I still would like to keep the c++ bindings disabled - even if only rpm was the > reason to do that. > Well, its normal for Fedora packages to enable as much features / bindings as possible. But its not mandatory, so although I would prefer c++ support being enabled (*), I'll also approve the package with it disabled. Note that Debian does have c++ support enabled be default. * unless there are good reasons not too, and requiring libstdc++ is not a good reason IMHO -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review