Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: rvm - RVM library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-15 14:43 EST ------- For 1.15-1: * License: ---------------------------------------------------- include/coda_mmap_anon.h GPLv2 rvm/rvm_map.c #include "coda_mmap_anon.h" 792 DEBUG: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -DRVM_USELWP -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT librvmlwp_la-rvm_map.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/librvmlwp_la-rvm_map.Tpo -c rvm_map.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_map.o 828 DEBUG: gcc -shared .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_init.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_map.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_unmap.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_tran s.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_logstatus.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_logflush.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_logrecovr.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_utils.o .libs/ librvmlwp_la-rvm_io.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_status.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_debug.o .libs/librvmlwp_la-rvm_printers.o -llwp -m32 -march=i386 - mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,librvmlwp.so.1 -o .libs/librvmlwp.so.1.2.2 seg/rvm_segutil.c #include "coda_mmap_anon.h" 846 DEBUG: gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I../include -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -MT libseglwp_la-rvm_segutil.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libseglwp_la-rvm_segutil.Tpo -c rvm_segutil.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/libseglwp_la-rvm_segutil.o 857 DEBUG: gcc -shared .libs/libseglwp_la-rvm_segutil.o .libs/libseglwp_la-rvm_loadseg.o .libs/libseglwp_la-rvm_createseg.o .libs/libseglwp_ la-rvm_releaseseg.o ../rvm/.libs/librvmlwp.so -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,libseglwp.so.1 -o .libs/libseglwp.so.1.2.2 900 DEBUG: gcc -shared .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_coalesce.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_free.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_init.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_malloc.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_prealloc.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_split.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_stats.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_start.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_util.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_zap.o .libs/librdslwp_la-rds_maxblock.o ../seg/.libs/libseglwp.so ../rvm/.libs/librvmlwp.so -llwp -m32 -march=i386 -mtune=generic -Wl,-soname -Wl,librdslwp.so.1 -o .libs/librdslwp.so.1.2.2 ---------------------------------------------------- - All GPLv2!! :( * Dependency for devel package ---------------------------------------------------- [tasaka1@localhost ~]$ LANG=C pkg-config --libs rvmlwp Package lwp was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `lwp.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'lwp', required by 'Recoverable Virtual Memory (lwp build)', not found ---------------------------------------------------- - This means that lwp-devel should be in the Requires of rvm-devel. * rpath hack ---------------------------------------------------- # Don't use rpath! sed -i 's|^hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=.*|hardcode_libdir_flag_spec=""|g' libtool sed -i 's|^runpath_var=LD_RUN_PATH|runpath_var=DIE_RPATH_DIE|g' libtool # work around linking failures because of the disabling of rpath above export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=`pwd`/rvm/.libs:`pwd`/seg/.libs ---------------------------------------------------- - Umm.. are there any better hack than this way? Especially adding the need of LD_LIBRARY_PATH like above is IMO not good, just creating a broken libtool. In such case, I usually - add /usr/lib /lib64 to sys_lib_search_path_spec in configure (as libtool is created from configure) Actually the diff of %_bindir/libtool between i386 and x86_64 shows this. - Or simply "make LIBTOOL=%_bindir/libtool" or cp %_bindir/libtool to working directory (BR: libtool is needed). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review