Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: tlock - terminal lock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444952 ------- Additional Comments From rc040203@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-05-06 04:05 EST ------- I would be able to sponsor you, ... we're making progress, but we're not quite there: # rpmlint tlock*-1.1-4.fc8.x86_64.rpm tlock.x86_64: E: devel-dependency tlock-devel => You've got the dependencies reversed. tlock-devel should "Requires: tlock = %{version}-%{release}" You have tlock "Requires: tlock-devel" tlock.x86_64: W: summary-not-capitalized tlock is a terminal lock => This warning can be ignored. tlock.x86_64: W: non-standard-group Application/System => please check /usr/share/doc/rpm*/GROUPS and choose appropriate one. tlock.x86_64: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 4 1.1-4.fc8 => The version numbers you choose in your %changelog do not match what Fedora expect. They need to be in the form "version-release", i.e. "1.1-4", instead of "4" tlock.x86_64: W: one-line-command-in-%postun /sbin/ldconfig => Can be ignored tlock-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postin /usr/lib64/librpass.so.0.0.0 tlock-devel.x86_64: E: library-without-ldconfig-postun /usr/lib64/librpass.so.0.0.0 tlock-devel.x86_64: W: no-dependency-on tlock These three are side-effects of the reversed dependencies between tlock and tlock-devel. They should resolve once you've got this sorted out. Further MUSTFIX, very closely related to the "tlock<->tlock-devel" deps issue: lib*.so.* should go into tlock lib*.so should go into tlock-devel -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review