Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: deco - Extractor for various archive file formats https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444366 ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-05-01 22:59 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > I think it's a bad idea to have Requires: on extractors of all supported file > types. The current list of "flac, arj, arc, cabextract, lzma" already looks > hopelessly incomplete and at the same time personally I'd already be annoyed if > installing deco would pull in things like arj or arc. So FWIW, +1 to not > depending on *any* archivers. Agreed. > On the other hand, if the supported archive types can be enabled on the fly by > placing symlinks somewhere (that's what I understood from the discussion, > haven't looked at the package), perhaps consider using %triggers (still without > dependencies!), see eg. the bash-completion package. This looks complicated to me. It seems to me that patching deco to have a way to tell that the program is not there and have a nice error message in that case would be better. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review