Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: geoclue - Geoclue is a modular geoinformation service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442693 mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From mclasen@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-28 09:13 EST ------- Builds fine in mock. [mclasen@localhost Desktop]$ rpmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-9-i386/result/geoclue-*.rpm geoclue-devel.i386: W: no-documentation geoclue-gui.i386: W: no-documentation Both of which are ignorable warnings. package name: ok spec file name: ok packaging guidelines: ok license: ok license field: ok license file: ok spec file language: ok spec file legibility: outstanding upstream sources: ok buildable: yes excludearch: n/a build deps: ok locale handling: ok ldconfig: ok relocatable: n/a directory ownership: ok duplicate files: ok file permissions: ok %clean: ok content: permissible documentation: the api docs should be moved to the -devel package headers: ok static libs: n/a pkgconfig files: ok shared libraries: ok devel package: ok libtool archives: ok gui apps: n/a file ownership: ok %install: ok utf8 filenames: ok Approved, but please move the api docs to the -devel package. I'll also note that the first attemot to run the test gui yields a segfault for me, the second run succeeds. Something to look into... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review