[Bug 438543] Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: Synopsis - Source-code introspection tool.


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438543





------- Additional Comments From ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx  2008-04-27 07:44 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> Thanks for the feedback ! It seems this is an incompatibility with yacc (it
> works fine with bison). I have fixed this problem, and will submit a new 
source
> package soon.
> 
> I'v been trying to package this on a x86_64 box myself, and run into another
> issue. May be you know how to address this:
> 
> In my spec file I list files, using the %{_libdir} variable, as per your 
earlier
> suggestion. This expands to /usr/lib64. However, the buildsystem itself uses
> autoconf, which provides a 'libdir' variable, but which expands to /usr/lib.
> Thus, my library files end up in /usr/lib, and then rpmbuild tries to find 
them
> in /usr/lib64, and obviously fails.
> What can I do about that ? autoconf and rpmbuild seem to disagree about the 
file
> system layout. Is there a way around this ? Is this a known issue ?
> 
> Thanks !

Fedora/redhat have a patched autoconf that handles the multi-arch lib issue.  
Most times, you just need to do:

autoreconf -f -i

and then do configure, build...

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]