[Bug 434973] Review Request: scidavis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: scidavis


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973





------- Additional Comments From eric.tanguy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-04-23 12:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #23)
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > Package build fine for F-8 and F-9.
> > I request an update for F-8 but for F-9 i don't know. Do you think it's still
> > possible to ask rel-eng to include it in F9-final ?
> 
> I think so. Request tagging into f9 final as described in [1], and explain that
> it is not really a freeze break, as the package was not frozen given it is a new
> package.
> 
> [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/ReleaseEngineering/FinalFreezePolicy

It's ok

> 
> > It fails for devel (F-10)
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577314&name=build.log but i
> > can't understand why. Help ?
> 
> Can't find -lssl. Hm, I think it should be a part of openssl-devel -- try adding
> it to BuildRequires.

I add openssl-devel to BR and now it builds fine but i don't understand why i
have to add this between F-9 and devel ...

> 
> > It fails for F-7
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=577305&name=root.log because
> > qwtplot3d-qt4-devel does not exist so i think qwtplot3d-devel has not been
> > rebuilt against qt4. Maybe i can let this build as this beacause F-7 will reach
> > end of life quite soon ?
> > It fails also for EL-5
> >
>
http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/logs/fedora-5-epel/38814-scidavis-0.1.2-1.el5/ppc/root.log
> > because PyQt4-devel and qwtplot3d-qt4-devel. For this build i'm not sure what to
> > do. Maybe the best would be to bugzilla these packages to ask the maintainer to
> > build their for EL-5?
> 
> Yep, I won't worry about F-7, since noone should really be using it in three
> weeks, but if you want this to go to EPEL, probably the best thing you can do is
> to ask the respective maintainers to create EL-5 branches via bugzilla. Note
> that in case they won't respond or won't want to maintian EL-5 branches, you can
> request and maintain the branches you need as well.
I will not worry about F-7 and EL-5 because it seems quite difficult to have
have it built against EL-5!



-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]