Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-20 01:50 EST ------- (In reply to comment #3) > > 3.) %configure --disable-numpy > > > > Is there a reason to disable numpy? We have numpy in Fedora afaik. > The package does not build with current numpy. Given that the last release of > python-gtkextra happened four years ago, I'd prefer avoiding extensive patching > (otherwise Fedora could become something like a new upstream for the package, > and I currently don't care about it that much). > > If an user requests numpy support - or if you insist on it - I'll take a look > and make it build (if not work), but I'd rather not. Other features of > python-gtkextra that don't build were dealt with in the same manner - by > removing them. Given there is a good reason to disable numpy support, I think it is not required. If someone requires numpy support, he can still open a bug report. 4.) python-gtkextra-1.1.0-update.patch What's this patch? Seems like a lot of unrelated changes -- is it a diff between release and a CVS snapshot? Please add a comment to it. 5.) rpmlint of python-gtkextra: python-gtkextra.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/pkgconfig/python-gtkextra.pc Apart from these two, fairly minor, issues, I see no more problems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review