Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-gtkextra - Python bindings for gtkextra https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442299 ------- Additional Comments From mitr@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-18 17:03 EST ------- > 1.) On 64 bit platforms files get installed into > /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra > > This causes the build to break since they are not included in plist, and also > causes the module not to work at all. They should get into > %{_libdir}/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra instead Fixed by using %python_sitelib for these files. I really should have tried an all-arch build :( An unfortunate side-effect is File listed twice: /usr/lib/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gtkextra on 32-bit architectures (once for %python_sitelib, once for %python_sitearch); I think that can be lived with. > 3.) %configure --disable-numpy > > Is there a reason to disable numpy? We have numpy in Fedora afaik. The package does not build with current numpy. Given that the last release of python-gtkextra happened four years ago, I'd prefer avoiding extensive patching (otherwise Fedora could become something like a new upstream for the package, and I currently don't care about it that much). If an user requests numpy support - or if you insist on it - I'll take a look and make it build (if not work), but I'd rather not. Other features of python-gtkextra that don't build were dealt with in the same manner - by removing them. New package is available at http://people.redhat.com/mitr/packaging/python-gtkextra-1.1.0-2.src.rpm , new spec file uploaded at the original URL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review