Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=171993 orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-15 17:58 EST ------- Need to change: < %{_datadir}/%{name}/*log* --- > %{_datadir}/%{name}/*.*log* to avoid having example_logging going into the base mpich2 package. mpich2-devel.i386: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/mpich2/bin32/mpif90/usr/bin/mp32-mpif90 (and same for mpif77, mpicc, mpicxx). Lots of: mpich2-libs.i386: W: conffile-without-noreplace-flag /etc/mpich2-32/mpe_callstack_ldflags.conf I also think a note should be made in the description of the package that this was compiled with the default options and so uses the mpd process manager and the ch3:sock communication device. Another thing to think about it who should take precedence among lam, openmpi, and mpich2 when they are all installed. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review