Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: konq-plugins - Additional plugins that interact with konqueror https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438126 ------- Additional Comments From kevin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-04-09 07:03 EST ------- Here's the evidence that the plugin is GPL: http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/extragear/base/konq-plugins/autorefresh/autorefresh.desktop?revision=748952&view=markup It says: X-KDE-PluginInfo-License=GPL The version isn't specified, but this isn't a blocker. And more generally speaking: The FAQ you pointed to says: 4. If neither the source, nor the upstream composed documentation says anything about the license version, then it could be under _ANY_ version of the GPL. The version listed in COPYING is irrelevant from this perspective. Technically it could be under any license, but if all we have to go by is COPYING, we'll guess COPYING is accurate. Now, keep in mind that most upstreams are probably leaving the versioning out by accident. If you get to case 4, you definitely want to let upstream know that you are unable to determine the applicable version(s) of the license from the source and documentation. They'll almost certainly let you know what their intended license version is, and (hopefully) correct it in the upstream source. The problem of missing license headers in some files is unfortunately fairly common, not only in KDE. I don't think we have any reason to consider this anything other than an accident, considering KDE's licensing policy. http://techbase.kde.org/Policies/Licensing_Policy (Note: There are older revisions which didn't require GPLv3 compatibility, but they all required licenses which are acceptable for Fedora.) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review