Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: php-pear-Propel - An Object Relational Mapping (ORM) framework for PHP5 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=266841 hans@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |hans@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From hans@xxxxxxxxx 2008-04-05 08:37 EST ------- Hi - I'm the lead developer for Propel. We haven't really had licensing questions come up, as is probably not surprising for a small, PHP project. That's not an excuse for having a bad license, merely an explanation of why we could find ourselves in this position now. I will note that I definitely spent some time researching this back in 2002 when the project started -- and know that I talked to the Torque folks about this question -- but I also will concede that there is clearly explicit documentation now indicating that these licenses are incompatible. So, not sure exactly what informed the decision that LGPL was compatible. We would like to resolve this problem (and respect the license of source work!); I am certain that getting the contributors to agree to a license change to a Apache-based license (e.g. PHP license?) will not be a problem. To correct our wiki document, original Propel was based on Torque at a time when I'm quite certain was actually the Apache 1.1 license. My understanding is that Apache 2 license wasn't released until much after original Propel release. I don't think that changes the basic problem here. I will work with the developers to get this resolved in a timely manner. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review