Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: x11vnc - VNC server for the current X11 session https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=439772 ------- Additional Comments From mmahut@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-31 09:27 EST ------- Manuel, Thank you for your comments. Major ======= 1) This shouldn't be an issue, but fixing. 2) Ooops :) 3) x11vnc itself (x11vnc/x11vnc.c) seems to be under GPLv2 libvncserver looks to be GPLv2+ and GPLv2. I consider "see GPL (latest version)" to the latest version in time of writing the document. However, I'm gonna use libvncserver from Fedora (--with-system-libvncserver) and not from the tarball. 4) Hm, I don't think so. The idea of using this minilzo code is to not include the whole big lzo package. If libvncserver project ships minilzo code inside, I suppose they take responsibility of maintaining it inside their code. 5) You're right, this is ugly. I'm excluding those classes from the packages. End-users can download those classes from upstream website (or use their java programs) with -httpdir switch. So it does not disable the ability of using x11vnc with a webserver. Minor ======= 1) Fixed 2) Removed Spec URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/x11vnc/x11vnc.spec SRPM URL: http://mmahut.fedorapeople.org/reviews/x11vnc/x11vnc-0.9.3-2.fc8.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review