Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fedora-ds: Meta-package for Fedora Directory Server Suite Alias: fedora-ds https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428368 ------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-27 19:01 EST ------- comment #11) > (In reply to comment #10) > > Well, under the current setup, you would get both, with the x86_64 binaries > > taking precedence. Looks like current plan is to fix yum so that you would only > > get the preferred architecture. > > Ok. I guess at that point I can then make fedora-ds noarch? You could make it noarch now. > > Why is fedora-ds-base multilib at the moment anyway? Is there any reason why > > you would want to run the 32-bit version on x86_64? > > Is it multilib? What makes it multilib? I don't think there is any reason to > run the 32-bit version on x86_64. fedora-ds-base is multilib because it has a -devel sub-package. I believe you can black list it by sending a request to rel-eng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx(In reply to -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review