[Bug 433199] Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: anjuta - A GNOME development IDE for C/C++


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433199


debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEEDINFO                    |ASSIGNED
               Flag|needinfo?(debarshi.ray@gmail|
                   |.com)                       |




------- Additional Comments From debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx  2008-03-27 00:11 EST -------
> * rpath issue
>   - Removing rpath can be done by the following.
>
> [...]
>
> sed -i.libdir_syssearch -e \
>         '/sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec/s|/usr/lib |/usr/lib /usr/lib64 /lib64 |' \
>         configure

You seem to have left out /lib. I  added it but that leads to the following
rpmlint error:
anjuta.src:103: E: hardcoded-library-path in /lib

Can't we use /%{lib} or %{_libdir} instead of hardcoding the paths?

> ! License
>   - For files under plugins/editor/scintilla, they have the license
>     term like
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> // Scintilla source code edit control
> /** @file AutoComplete.cxx
>  ** Defines the auto completion list box.
>  **/
> // Copyright 1998-2003 by Neil Hodgson <neilh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> // The License.txt file describes the conditions under which this software may
> be distributed.
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>     However License.txt cannot be found anywhere.
>     From http://scintilla.sourceforge.net/License.txt it seems
>     MIT (so GPLv2+ compatible), however would you ask the upstream
>     to add License.txt from the next version?

I have added "and MIT" to the License tag of the main package because this looks
like a multiple licensing scenario (and not mixed licensing).


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]