[Bug 437419] Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: edrip-fonts - Edrip decorative fonts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437419


nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ASSIGNED                    |CLOSED
         Resolution|                            |RAWHIDE




------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-26 20:21 EST -------
> 1. 20080318 is out, perhaps update to that before importing?

done

> 2. The
> Source0:   %{URL}/%{archivename}.tar.bz2
> doesn't seem to work with spectool.

This is a spectool problem. Open a spectool bug if you care (I don't)

> Why not just replace %{URL} with the URL. Do you expect it to keep changing?

I suck at keeping URLs in sync. The less I have to manage the better I feel (I
still remember the 13-package gfs rebuild for upstream move with dread)

> Why not replace %{archivename} with the more standard %{name}-src-%{release} ?

Standard is in the eye of the beholder. I maintain and saw many packages that
used %{archivename}

Anyway package is now imported, thanks for the review


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]