Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ricci - cluster and systems management agent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433678 ------- Additional Comments From cfeist@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-26 16:54 EST ------- rpmlint results: ricci.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ricci/certs/cacert.config ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ricci/certs/cacert.config ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ricci/certs ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ricci/certs ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/ricci ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ricci/queue ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ricci/queue ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ricci/certs/clients ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ricci/certs/clients ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-uid /var/lib/ricci ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /var/lib/ricci ricci ricci.i386: E: non-standard-dir-perm /var/lib/ricci 0700 ricci.i386: E: non-standard-gid /usr/libexec/ricci/ricci-worker ricci ricci.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libcap ricci.i386: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2 The non-standard uid/gid errors are ok because a ricci user is created for the daemon to run under. The non-standard-dir-perm error is ok because only the ricci user should have access to that directory. I've fixed the explicit-lib-dependency errors in my patch that I'm attaching (as well as a minor fix to the BuildRoot location. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review