[Bug 433778] Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: fsvs - full system versioning using subversion repositories


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433778





------- Additional Comments From wolfy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-25 08:17 EST -------
Take this with a grain of salt, I did not do a thorough check:
- I suggest replacing all "/usr/bin" references with "%{_bindir} (see "mkdir -p
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin" and "cp -p src/fsvs $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/bin")
- use %{_sysconfdir} and %{_var} in "%define conf_dir /etc/fsvs/" and "%define
waa_dir /var/spool/fsvs"
- /usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/ is included but not owned
- rpmlint has complains about the binary rpm:
fsvs.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/var/lib/fsvs-versioning/scripts/shadow-clean.pl
fsvs.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/var/lib/fsvs-versioning/scripts/remove-password-line.pl
fsvs.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/setup.sh
fsvs.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/fsvs 0775
fsvs.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/var/lib/fsvs-versioning/scripts/commit.sh
fsvs.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/var/lib/fsvs-versioning/scripts/remove-password-line.pl
/usr/bin/perl
fsvs.x86_64: W: doc-file-dependency
/usr/share/doc/fsvs-1.1.13/example/var/lib/fsvs-versioning/scripts/shadow-clean.pl
/usr/bin/perl
- the mandatory RPM_OPT_FLAGS flags seem to be ignored. Unfortunately the
standard "CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" make" and "make CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS""
solutions did not work, so I think you should take a look at the source,
probably the Makefile needs patching.


As of the explicit Requires, your test is flawed because you use --nodeps. As
shown below, they are not needed for the simple reason that rpmbuild's dep
checker adds them :
[wolfy@wolfy tmp]$ rpm -qp --requires
/home/wolfy/reports/fsvs/fsvs-1.1.13-1.fc9.x86_64.rpm
/bin/sh
/usr/bin/perl
libapr-1.so.0()(64bit)
libaprutil-1.so.0()(64bit)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)(64bit)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)(64bit)
libdl.so.2()(64bit)
libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.2.5)(64bit)
libgdbm.so.2()(64bit)
libpcre.so.0()(64bit)
libsvn_delta-1.so.0()(64bit)
libsvn_ra-1.so.0()(64bit)
libsvn_subr-1.so.0()(64bit)
rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
rtld(GNU_HASH)
The package was built locally in mock, without including any of the "Requires" lines

I am attaching the modified spec which fixes most of the above mentioned issues.
The only rpmlint warning remaining is 
fsvs.x86_64: E: non-standard-executable-perm /usr/bin/fsvs 0775
which I think that must also be fixed, I see no reason for g+w


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]