Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: scidavis https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434973 ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-24 10:38 EST ------- > > > > 2.) Try to specify an URL for these: > > > > > > > > Source5: application-x-scidavis.svg > > > > Source6: application-x-scidavis-32x32.png > > > > Source7: application-x-scidavis-48x48.png > > > > Source8: application-x-scidavis-128x128.png > > > > > > > > Or at least a comment where did you get those. > > > > Is it needed to include the pngs? > > > > > > > > > > They come from the svn version. I had some exchange with upstream about how to > > > handle desktop and mime and this will be incuded in the next version. > > > > This still doesn't seem correct to me. Is this the file? > > > http://scidavis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/*checkout*/scidavis/trunk/icons/scidavis-icon.svg?revision=709 > > > > If yes, please either specify it in Source: and rename when installing it, or at > > least put a comment above it. > > > > And the pngs -- are they needed? When it comes to icons; SVG is generally > > sufficient. > > The files are from > http://scidavis.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/scidavis/branches/current_stable/scidavis/icons/ > and it seems that the svg file is not sufficient http://standards.freedesktop.org/icon-theme-spec/icon-theme-spec-latest.html#icon_lookup SVG should be sufficient. Can you please describe in details how didn't it work for you? > > How about untarring it in %prep after %setup of Source0? > > Either just untar it to directory where you are after it, or make some > > constructive use of %setup macro. It can take a variety of useful, yet somewhat > > tricky options: see [1]. > > > > [1] http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm/s1-rpm-inside-macros.html > > It seems now doc are better handled but i have a problem : the scidavis-manual > package have the doc in /usr/share/doc/scidavis-manual-0.1.2/ but the scidavis > binary file will look for manual in /usr/share/doc/scidavis-0.1.2/manual/ > > is it possible to do this ? If the binary looks for manual, you can safely install the manual in /usr/share/doc/scidavis-0.1.2/manual/, while nor being marked %doc. Another solution would be to patch the program. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review
