Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: initng-conf-gtk - InitNG configuration and control utility https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=222338 akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From akahl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-23 07:22 EST ------- (In reply to comment #18) > (In reply to comment #17) > > I know, but it is always good to have alternatives and just because upstart is > > there it doesn't mean initng will be useless. > > Yep. I myself haven't used anything else but initng to boot my Linux machines > since initng 0.0.something and it's definitely doing it's thing good... IIRC people are concerned over the way initng handles proper startup of init scripts and lacking sysV init compatibility which upstart offers, hence the decision was made to favor the latter. But if initng floats one's boat, he or she should be able to install it. > Darn. Of course it'd have to be something like this when I for once didn't check > the files with rpmlint. Fixed it now though, the new srpm is > http://download.initng.org/initng-gui/initng-conf-gtk/initng-conf-gtk-0.5.1-4.fc8.src.rpm Confirmed. Also checked once more the package builds in mock for rawhide. Package still owns all directories it creates and owns no directories from other packages. Small last fix before you cvs-import the package: Change "built in" in the description to "built-in". =============================== This package is APPROVED by me. =============================== P.S. the German translation of initng-conf-gtk is pretty bad but that doesn't matter for this review - I could help out with a better one, just drop me an email. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review