[Bug 432262] Review Request: flobopuyo - 2-player falling bubbles game

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: flobopuyo - 2-player falling bubbles game


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432262





------- Additional Comments From packages@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-22 19:33 EST -------
* rpmlint: No Problems
* Package named correctly: Yes
* Patches named correctly: Yes
* Spec file named correctly: Yes
* Licence(s) acceptable: Yes
* Licence field matches: Not Quite (!!) See below
* Licence file installed: Yes and included upstream
* Spec file in American English: Yes
* Source matches upstream: Yes
* Locales use %find_lang: N/A
* Contains %clean: Yes
* %install contain rm -rf %{buildroot} or similar: Yes
* Specfile legible: Yes
* Compiles and builds ok: Yes (mock i386/ppc/x86_64 in devel)
* Calls ldconfig in %post/%postun for shlibs: N/A
* Owns directories it creates: Yes
* Duplicate files: No
* Permissions set correctly: Yes
* Consistent macro use: Generally yes (!!) see comments
* Separate -doc needed (for large docs): N/A
* %doc affects runtime: N/A
* Headers and static libs in -devel: N/A
* .pc files in -devel: N/A
* .so in -devel: N/A
* -devel requires base: N/A
* Contains .la files: N/A
* Owns files it didn't create: No
* .desktop files included and installed correctly: Yes
* Filenames valid UTF8: Yes


1. The files glSDL.h and glSDL.c are marked as LGPL, so the license field
might need to be:

# glSDL.h and glSDL.c are LGPL+, all others are GPLv2+
License:        GPLv2+ and LGPL+


2. Not a blocker, but macro usage could be improved a little, for example when
referring to the man page.


Damn, I was playing this game for over an hour, before I remembered I was in the
middle of a review! :-)

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]