[Bug 438105] Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® universal remote controls

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: libconcord - Library to talk to Logitech® Harmony® universal remote controls


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438105





------- Additional Comments From silfreed@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-21 13:57 EST -------
(In reply to comment #3)
> 1) Missing "Requires: libusb", or does that get picked up automatically by 
rpm
> based on running ldd on libconcord.so?

Explicit Requires are discouraged; the dependency should be picked up 
automatically.

> 2) I don't think you need "Requires: /sbin/ldconfig" since it's part of the 
base
> package set.
> 
> If you are going to include this, it seems common to only require it for 
script
> execution time, e.g.:
> 
> libgeda/devel/libgeda.spec:16:Requires(post): /sbin/ldconfig
> libgeda/devel/libgeda.spec:17:Requires(postun): /sbin/ldconfig

It's a library so it's required.

> 3) There are more (double and more) blank lines in the spec than there 
probably
> should be, according to examples I've seen of existing spec files. Not a
> functional problem, but best to keep formatting consistent with existing 
specs
> and fedora Wiki examples.

I'm following the format of the example spec files in rpmdevtools.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]