Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Devel-LexAlias - Alias lexical variables Alias: perl-Devel-LexAlias https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437918 panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-18 02:58 EST ------- Review: + package builds in mock. Koji build => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=520466 + rpmlint is silent for SRPM and for RPM. + source files match upstream url 7fe986f50b467fa8575a67f0729fbb1d Devel-LexAlias-0.04.tar.gz + package meets naming and packaging guidelines. + specfile is properly named, is cleanly written + Spec file is written in American English. + Spec file is legible. + dist tag is present. + build root is correct. + license is open source-compatible. + License text is included in package. + %doc is present. + BuildRequires are proper. + %clean is present. + package installed properly. + Macro use appears rather consistent. + Package contains code, not content. + no headers or static libraries. + no .pc file present. + no -devel subpackage + no .la files. + no translations are available + Does owns the directories it creates. + no scriptlets present. + no duplicates in %files. + file permissions are appropriate. + make test gave All tests successful. Files=1, Tests=11, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.03 cusr + 0.00 csys = 0.03 CPU) + Package perl-Devel-LexAlias-0.04-1.fc9 => Provides: LexAlias.so perl(Devel::LexAlias) = 0.04 Requires: libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) perl >= 0:5.005003 perl(Devel::Caller) perl(DynaLoader) rtld(GNU_HASH) APPROVED. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review