Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: miredo - Implementation of Teredo proposed standard https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=437626 stjepan.gros@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sgros@xxxxxxxxxxxxx BugsThisDependsOn| |177841 ------- Additional Comments From stjepan.gros@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-15 08:16 EST ------- rpmlint gives the following messages for the base package: miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libteredo.so miredo.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libtun6.so miredo.x86_64: E: non-executable-script /etc/miredo/miredo.conf 0644 But, as I understand it, dynamic libraries do not belong to development packages? Also, why is miredo.conf treated as a script when in the spec file it's explicitly marked as config? What is missing is init.d script (are there any templates? Also, there is possibility for this packate to be split into client and server packages? Should I do it? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review