Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: viewmtn - Web interface for Monotone version control system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435842 ------- Additional Comments From thomas.moschny@xxxxxx 2008-03-14 15:17 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm just trying to follow Fedora packaging guidelines. Which clearly say, that FHS is to follow: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#head-e1c5548cbbe551c7a43d375c524ab2ea0188557e and any deviation from that should be rationalized in the review process. That's all I'm trying to do. > With the sense of the symlink inverted, I cannot get the package to build > because of unpackaged /etc/*.py[oc] files. You have a point here. We probably should bug upstream (later, that is), to find a cleaner solution for configuring ViewMTN. I will ask Grahame. But you didn't answer my two questions: - What is the purpose of the symlink in /etc? - How do you prevent the config file %{python_sitelib}/viewmtn/user_config.py from being overwritten during an update? > The database sharing really is not a simple problem, I told you the truth. Already said that I'm not insisting on that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review