Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ETL-devel - Extended Template Library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428567 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-12 10:43 EST ------- /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.41093: line 40: autoreconf: command not found Missing BR: automake But the etl_profile.h is still here! In my mind it should be removed and the tests for definitions should be done by synfig. This would remove the need of using autotools for ETL and thus, produce a clean noarch package for ETL (without pkgconfig nor ETL-config needs as it just need to find where are the headers, use -lpthread and the proper HAVE_ definitions for ETL). On the other side: this is a special case here as no lib is built. So, removing any config.h-like file is like removing it after the configure step and before building the software on the usual case. In this case, this is senseless and in my mind we may keep this etl_profile.h ... Others point of view can be expressed... for now, T'm test building synfig for F-9 with this package... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review