Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: fuse-s3fs - Fuse filesystem for amazon.com's S3 storage service https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435155 ------- Additional Comments From nhorman@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-11 22:40 EST ------- "rpm and/or man page) should have a BIG warning until fuse-s3fs get stabilised" I actually had a warning on the project page and removed it as I am reasonably confident in its stability. I do however take your point since its not seen widespread use. I'll add a warning to the rpm description. "...What is this format ?" It is precisely what I indicated it was. All the metadata for the fs is stored in a python class that is pickled. If you want to see what the data structure looks like, all you need to do is look at the s3fs code. Trying to describe it in words I don't think would serve any additional purpose. If you need specifics, you can look at the S3DriveMetaData class. thats the one that gets pickled. This is of course not compatible with most other tools. However, metadata aside, the files themselves that you store in s3fs are stored directly as individual files (stored as their fully qualified path names). As such, even if the metadata gets corrupted (or reformatted), the files are still present on S3. While they won't be seen from an s3fs mount, they can still be retrieved via a web interface (like www.s3browse.com). "From de man page : - "-f <bucket> Format an s3 bucket to make it suitable for mounting" Format and so destroy all previous data ?" no acutally (as per my previous paragraph) "The man page does not give the default values" for the mount options? I can add that. I'll also reconcile the drive/bucket discrepancy, as they are, as you have likely guessed, synonomous. I have a class to teach tomorrow, but I'll try to get to these and repost in the afternoon. Thanks! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review