Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dspam - Scalable and open-source content-based spam filter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435121 ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-11 09:30 EST ------- - MUST: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig' (for directory ownership and usability). - MUST: If a package contains library files with a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so.1.1), then library files that end in .so (without suffix) must go in a -devel package. See dspam backends, which contains for example libhash_drv.so. You can use %exclude, if they are not required for package. - MUST: In the vast majority of cases, devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency: Requires: %{name} = %{version}-%{release} - you also shoud add "." at end of description tags :-) I see no more problems for this package. After fixing these problems, I can approve your package, but it will be better to wait for an sponsor, if you want to be sponsored. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review