[Bug 433547] Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: nagios-nsca - nagios passive check daemon


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433547





------- Additional Comments From xavier@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-10 14:45 EST -------
+ source files match upstream:
33a98e7975f633a9489d7a8938ed6131

+ package meets naming and versioning guidelines.

+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.

+ dist tag is present.

+ build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)

+ license field matches the actual license.

+ license is open source-compatible. License text not included upstream.

+ latest version is being packaged.

+ BuildRequires are proper.

+ compiler flags are appropriate.

+ package builds in mock ( ).

+ package installs properly

+ debuginfo package looks complete.

+ rpmlint is not silent, but the 2 warnings are expected :
nsca.i386: E: non-readable /etc/nagios/nsca.cfg 0600
nsca-client.i386: E: non-readable /etc/nagios/send_nsca.cfg 0600

+ final provides and requires are sane:
Provides: config(nsca) = 2.7.2-4.el5
Requires(interp): /bin/sh /bin/sh /bin/sh
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires(post): /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig
Requires(preun): /bin/sh /sbin/chkconfig /sbin/service
Requires(postun): /bin/sh /sbin/service
Requires: /bin/sh config(nsca) = 2.7.2-4.el5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4) libc.so.6(GLIB
C_2.4) libmcrypt.so.4 libnsl.so.1 nagios rtld(GNU_HASH)

Provides: config(nsca-client) = 2.7.2-4.el5
Requires(rpmlib): rpmlib(CompressedFileNames) <= 3.0.4-1
rpmlib(PayloadFilesHavePrefix) <= 4.0-1
Requires: config(nsca-client) = 2.7.2-4.el5 libc.so.6 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.3.4)
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libmcrypt.so.4 libnsl.so.1 rtld(GNU_HASH)

+ no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
- owns the directories it creates.
nsca-client should own /etc/nagios because it doesn't require nagios.
nsca doesn't because it requires nagios.

+ doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ scriptlets follow guidelines.
+ code, not content.
+ documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
+ %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
+ no headers.
+ no pkgconfig files.
+ no libtool .la droppings.
+ not a GUI app.

just add %dir %{_sysconfdir}/nagios for the client and it should be good to go.

additional note : nsca-2.7.2-initreload.patch might need to be renamed now it
does more than just add reload to the init script.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]