Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xerces-c27 - Compatibility package for Xerces C++ 2.7.0 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435125 tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tcallawa@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-07 16:06 EST ------- Review ======= Good: - rpmlint checks return: xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/xerces-c-2.7.0/libxerces-c.so ../libxerces-c.so.27 xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: W: dangling-relative-symlink /usr/lib64/xerces-c-2.7.0/libxerces-depdom.so ../libxerces-depdom.so.27 xerces-c27-devel.x86_64: E: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib All are safe to ignore. - package meets naming guidelines - package meets packaging guidelines - license (ASL 2.0) OK, text in %doc, matches source - spec file legible, in am. english - source matches upstream - package compiles on devel (x86_64) - no missing BR - no unnecessary BR - no locales - not relocatable - owns all directories that it creates - no duplicate files - permissions ok - %clean ok - macro use consistent - code, not content - doc subpackage OK - nothing in %doc affects runtime - no need for .desktop file - devel subpackage OK, depends on base package Approved. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review