Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xdvipdfmx - An extended version of DVIPDFMx with support for XeTeX output https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436114 pertusus@xxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |pertusus@xxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From pertusus@xxxxxxx 2008-03-06 14:55 EST ------- There is a typo, the Requires is tex(tex) not te(tex). I think that it would be nice to have a comment for the dvipdfmx requires. Also I think that there should be a %dist tag. The source archive timestamp cannot be kept looks like it changes at each download. The source match: 2bb9d65f2406a112fa53dbd0697d93ad xdvipdfmx-0.4.tar.gz If the typo is fixed, and the %dist tag is added, it is APPROVED. I can be co-maintainer and I think that Jindrich and Jonathan should also be co-maintainer (if they agree to). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review