Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: maildrop - Mail delivery agent with filtering abilities https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=241596 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-06 10:39 EST ------- For 2.0.4-5: * License tag - License tag "GPL" is no longer valid for Fedora. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/LicensingGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing * Static archive only -devel subpackage packaging - For static archive only -devel subpackage, please follow "Packaging Static Libraries" subsection of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines * /sbin/ldconfig - Why is calling of /sbin/ldconfig on %post/%postun needed? * Header file include: - For example, /usr/include/rfc2045.h contains: --------------------------------------------------------------- 12 #include "../rfc2045/rfc2045_config.h" /* VPATH build */ --------------------------------------------------------------- but rfc2045_config.h does not exist. ! fedora specific compilation flags - Well, now from build.log, I cannot check if Fedora specific compilation flags are correctly honored (from the output like below:) --------------------------------------------------------------- 1932 make[2]: Entering directory `/builddir/build/BUILD/maildrop-2.0.4/numlib' 1933 Compiling atotimet.c 1934 Compiling atouidt.c 1935 Compiling changeuidgid.c 1936 Compiling strdevt.c 1937 Compiling strgidt.c --------------------------------------------------------------- Please make the build.log more verbose so that we can check how compiler flags are used from build.log. ! /usr/bin/sendmail - Well, perhaps no one except for me may complain about this, however currencly sendmail license is in question (ref: bug 409361). Is it possible to make this package avoid sendmail? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review