[Bug 428568] Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: synfig - Synfig is a vector based 2D animation package


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428568





------- Additional Comments From marc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-03-06 09:02 EST -------
(In reply to comment #7)
> 1* URL: please rip off /Main_Page from the url in the case they change the name,
> http://synfig.org/ should be enough.
> 

Done

> 2* BuildRequires - it is usually better to use one line by requirement, so the
> BR would be versioned and changes can be seen easily via our cvs. But I leave
> this up to you.

Done

> 
> 3* Remove: Requires:       pkgconfig, ImageMagick

Done

> 
> 4* %description : Remove the added space from the beginning of the line:
>  high dynamic range images, and a flexible plugin system.

Done

> 
> 5* %package devel
>  - BuildRequires is a wrong item from a -devel package, you should only use
> Requires:
>  - pkgconfig is already provided by ETL-devel, no need to add it twice
>  - synfig.pc has Requires:  OpenEXR ETL libxml++-2.6 sigc++-2.0
>  you have to add all theses requires using the package name form.
>  - Requires:       synfig and %{name} = %{version}-%{release} are the same
> requirement, please remove synfig and use %{name} = %{version}-%{release}
> (versionned requires), instead.

Done

> 
> 6* Prevent timestramps changes for installed headers. Use:
>  make install DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -p"

Done

> 
> 7* Again, please remove theses lines: (unneeded)
> %post devel -p /sbin/ldconfig
> %postun devel -p /sbin/ldconfig

Done

> 
> 8* %doc README doc/ - Theses doc are installed twice (in main and -devel)
> if the documentation is big, you may need to split into a separate package.
> It also depend if this is development related doc or user doc.

development and shifted there

> 
> 9* Do we really need this file ? ltdl should take care of the available module
> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/synfig_modules.cfg
> can you see where the file (and it's path) is written within the source code ?
> At least I don't expect this file is aimed for user edition, so you may need to
> only use %config in this case.

Needed and left as is with the theory that if someone has modified it I should
not overwrite it.  It will cause less breakage this way I think in the long run.

> 
> 10* %{_bindir}/synfig-config same tweak is required from the ETL-config
> you will need to keep the timestramps from a reference file using something like
> touch -r README $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_bindir}/synfig-config (same for ETL-config )
> 

Done 

> 11* mod_imagemagick, mod_magickpp, mod_mng and mod_gradient seems not to have
> been built. (mod_libavcodec is expected). you need to figure out why.
> 
> vImage ---------------------------> no
> ImageMagick ----------------------> no
> Magick++ -------------------------> no
> ...
> Using OpenEXR's "half" type ------> no
> 
> Look at the config.log to see missing BR or wrong directory search paths for
> library detection.

vImage = propietary, ImageMagick and Magick++ yes OpenEXR half slows down synfig
upstream has requested we leave it as is.

http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/synfig/synfig.spec
http://mwiriadi.fedorapeople.org/packages/synfig/synfig-0.61.08-3.fc9.src.rpm

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]