[Bug 433225] Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225





------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx  2008-03-04 06:49 EST -------
(In reply to comment #9)
> The release is 0.20.... while dvipdfmx coming from current texlive
> is 19. It is bad. I suggest using directly 20, even if it is against
> the guideline, and use something like
> 20.1.20071115cvs
> to avoid going higher than 20, since dvipdfmx in texlive is already 
> wrong. Another possibility would be to use epochs, but I think we should
> avoid as much as possible.

I would much much much rather use an epoch to get around this problem - I think
it's really important to try to stick to the guidelines for version/release tags
since things like automated package rebuild scripts can/will fail for packages
which don't follow the guidelines.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]