Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dvipdfmx - A DVI to PDF translator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433225 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx 2008-03-04 06:49 EST ------- (In reply to comment #9) > The release is 0.20.... while dvipdfmx coming from current texlive > is 19. It is bad. I suggest using directly 20, even if it is against > the guideline, and use something like > 20.1.20071115cvs > to avoid going higher than 20, since dvipdfmx in texlive is already > wrong. Another possibility would be to use epochs, but I think we should > avoid as much as possible. I would much much much rather use an epoch to get around this problem - I think it's really important to try to stick to the guidelines for version/release tags since things like automated package rebuild scripts can/will fail for packages which don't follow the guidelines. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review