Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: wstx - Woodstox Stax Implementation https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=252110 j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2008-03-01 13:57 EST ------- Hmm, When I suggested in Bug 227121 to mark it as a duplicate of this and to reopen this, and that I then would review this, I was kind of hoping that I would only be reviewing it, as I'm not mighty familiar with java. The only reason I'm interested in wstx, is because it beats the stax implementation shipped by default with icedtea by a factor of 10 when it comes to speed, making the loading of freecol (a game written in java I maintain) about 10 times faster. So perhaps a co-maintainership is the best solution, I can take either role (submitter or reviewer) now, and then later we maintain this together? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review