Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: jruby - Pure Java implementation of the Ruby interpreter https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=417511 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-03-01 04:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #7) > The current status of stuff (or what I would say is most important) is that a > large portion of the BRs don't exist yet in Fedora (due to the nascent Java > packaging guidelines) or are hugely outdated. So I predict this package won't > get in for quite a while because of this. > > But here's the shopping list: > > * asm 3.0 (we currently have asm2, which is 2.1) > * emma (we don't have this at all yet) > * jarjar (we don't have this either) > * jline (we have 0.9.9, upstream is 0.9.94) > * jna (we don't have it at all) > * joda-time (we don't have it at all) > * joni (we don't have this, but I probably can/will package it) > * junit (we have this one! phew!) > * retroweaver (we don't have this at all either) > > So a lot of this stuff needs to enter Fedora before jruby can. I hope that we > can get this stuff in and then jruby by F10. Maybe that is a lofty goal :). Thank you for investigating BR. This list is very useful for getting jruby into Fedora. Then would you also write: - this BR is already in Fedora - Someone has already submitted a review request for this BR - Or even no review request has been submitted for this BR if you know? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review