Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: mldonkey - MLDonkey is a multi-platform multi-network peer-to-peer client (ocaml) https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433143 ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-02-29 07:07 EST ------- In my view, the two potential maintainers (Richard and Peter) need to co-ordinate their work to be co-maintainer of the package. (either in livna or Fedora). @Richard As your are the ocaml maintainer in Fedora, your interest in mldonkey is valuable. And as such, the ocaml-find-requires.sh requirement is an important improvement. So thx for trying to solve this. But lot of work is missing (and as already be done in the Peter's spec). As such, if I would review this package, I would just put a "-", with the reason "Not enought work to review". Actually the potential reviewers that has already been involved in the mldonkey review, wouldn't play with reviewing the same package twice. If you can find a reviewer that could review the package from the start, I will have nothing about this. So please co-ordinate with Peter work. And I hope you understand my point of view. @Peter As I said from the livna review, some dependencies are still missing to just work normally after a yum install. Either you or Richard, need to be the primary maintainer of the package. You need to solve this together even if you may not know each other very well for now. So please start proposing things... -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review