Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250 ------- Additional Comments From michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-28 11:17 EST ------- > "... and nothing has broken since ..." That is a good hint but a pretty weak argument, appearences to the contrary. If those files were used mostly for i386 and x86_64 then there are many similarities here, including endianess. Checking in sources that a byte compiler is indeed arch-independent would be a different matter. I looked through installed "noarch" packages on one system and peeked at such few which could be a subpackage; like 'gimp-help', for example. They all appear to build separately; so this seems to support what I said in comment #7. OTOH is there really any good reason for somebody to try to install sawfish.i386 and sawfish.x86_64 at the same time which would require two variants of librep and would cause conflicts on files from "common"? I do not see any but possibly I miss something. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review