[Bug 431250] Review Request: librep - An embeddable LISP environment

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: librep -  An embeddable LISP environment


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=431250





------- Additional Comments From michal@xxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-02-28 11:17 EST -------
> "... and nothing has broken since ..."

That is a good hint but a pretty weak argument, appearences to the contrary.
If those files were used mostly for i386 and x86_64 then there are many
similarities here, including endianess.  Checking in sources that a byte
compiler is indeed arch-independent would be a different matter.

I looked through installed "noarch" packages on one system and peeked
at such few which could be a subpackage; like 'gimp-help', for example.
They all appear to build separately; so this seems to support what
I said in comment #7.  OTOH is there really any good reason for somebody
to try to install sawfish.i386 and sawfish.x86_64 at the same time
which would require two variants of librep and would cause conflicts
on files from "common"?  I do not see any but possibly I miss something.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]