Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: xnec2c - GTK based graphical wrapper for nec2c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434853 kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From kanarip@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-25 16:17 EST ------- RPM Lint: OK Package name: OK Spec file: OK License: OK Actual License: OK %doc License: Non available OK Spec file language: OK Spec file readable: OK Upstream source vs. used tarball: Not in the SRPM provided above; source is a 404 Compile and Build: - F-7: OK - F-8: - rawhide: - EL-5: Applicable Package Guidelines: - -debuginfo package: OK (~408K) Locales: N/A Shared libs: N/A Relocatable: N/A Directory and file ownership: OK No duplicate files in %files: OK File Permissions: OK Macro usage: OK Code vs. Content: OK (Large) Documentation: OK %doc affecting runtime: OK Header files in -devel package: N/A Static Libraries in -static package: N/A pkgconfig Requires: N/A Library files: N/A Devel requires base package: N/A .la libtool archives: N/A Duplicate ownership of files/directories: OK Remove BuildRoot: OK UTF-8 filenames: OK Problems with this package: Source is unavailable from the given location, old versions are removed from that location by upstream. Could thus also not verify md5sum match. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review