Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: dotconf - Required for speech dispatcher on OLPC XO https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433253 ------- Additional Comments From assim.deodia@xxxxxxxxx 2008-02-22 04:23 EST ------- (In reply to comment #4) > Created an attachment (id=295402) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=295402&action=view) [edit] > Patch to remove ASL 1.1 part for GPLv2+ compatibility > > By the way: > > - speech-dispatcher (bug 432259), which depends on this bug, is > licensed under GPLv2+. > So to make use of speech-dispatcher the license of dotconf must > be GPLv2+ compatible. > > - However currently this package (dotconf) is licensed under > LGPLv2 and ASL 1.1 as build log shows: > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > /bin/sh ../libtool --mode=link gcc -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -fexceptions -fstack-protector --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -m32 -march=i386 > -mtune=generic -fasynchronous-unwind-tables > -I/home/tasaka1/rpmbuild/SOURCES/dotconf-1.0.13-1.fc7/dotconf-1.0.13/libpool > -Wall -g -o libdotconf.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 10:4:10 -release > 1.0 -export-dynamic dotconf.lo readdir.lo > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > and src/readdir.c is ASL 1.1 > Note that ASL 1.1 is GPLv2 incompatible, so this situation is not > allowed. > > Fortunately for Linux as far as I checked the source code > we can built this package without src/readdir.{c,h}. The attached > file makes this package surely LGPLv2. I have again updated the file at the server. Have included the patch file on the server also link:http://www.nsitonline.in/assim/stuffs/olpc/dotconf/dotconf- 1.0.13.patch. I have done all the edits as said except for the last one - For %{_bindir}/dotconf-config (in the source tarball it was dotconf-config.in), @libdir@ is expanded as /usr/lib on 32bits machine but /usr/lib64 on 64bits machine on Fedora. This means that /usr/bin/dotconf-config differs between on 32 bits machine and on 64 bits machine. Currently Fedora does not allow this type of multilib conflicts for -devel subpackage. I am a complete newbie to package building so can you please provide me some pointer regarding this issue? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review