Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ocaml-fileutils - OCaml library for common file and filename operations https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=253571 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-21 16:33 EST ------- Well, the COPYING file says: The Library is distributed under the terms of the GNU Library General Public License version 2 (found in /usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2 on debian systems). but all of the files in the libfileutils-ocaml directory say: (* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or *) (* modify it under the terms of the GNU Library General Public *) (* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either *) (* version 2 of the License, or any later version ; with the OCaml *) (* static compilation exception. *) and the statements on the code always win unless, of course, there is an issue with combining them which would somehow limit the license. Of course, someone should introduce a clue to upstream about this, but in the meantime it really does look like LGPLv2+ to me. Honestly the issue of a plus or not isn't something worth holding this package up over; you can fix it when you check in. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review