Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: opengrok - A wicked fast source browser Alias: opengrok-review https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433312 lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: opengrok - A|Review Request: opengrok - A |wicked fast source browser |wicked fast source browser |[NEEDS WORK] | ------- Additional Comments From lkundrak@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-20 17:58 EST ------- mock: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.noarch/ SRPM: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/mock-results/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.noarch/opengrok-0.5-6.e3806d642190.fc8.src.rpm SPEC: http://people.redhat.com/lkundrak/SPECS/opengrok.spec Ready for review. Known outstanding issues: 1.) webapp doesn't work. Probably broken by upstream in snapshot. Will investigate more. 2.) SVN jar thingie; see blockers 3.) Dependencies; see blockers RPMlint: opengrok.noarch: W: dangling-symlink /usr/share/java/svn-javahl.jar /usr/lib64/svn-javahl/svn-javahl.jar opengrok.noarch: W: symlink-should-be-relative /usr/share/java/svn-javahl.jar /usr/lib64/svn-javahl/svn-javahl.jar Both are related to bug #433295, it will go away once the bug is fixed. Rationale behind using the snapshot is features -- 0.5 can't be reconfigured without modifying WAR. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review