Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: ivtv-firmware - Firmware for the PVR 250/350/150/500 model series https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250970 kwizart@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kwizart@xxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From kwizart@xxxxxxxxx 2008-02-20 06:53 EST ------- >From #20 >That been said, keeping compat location are fine for RHEL4 and RHEL5, (if this >make sense to have them, but i don't think so as your repository have 0.10.6 for >RHEL5 and 2.6.18 kernels)... Let me rephrase: EPEL may need packages to be functional by itself. ivtv-firmware is missing the needed kernel module. It is possible to use ivtv-kmdl from any third part repo to use ivtv-firmware. But using ivtv-firmware alone is pointless. At this time ivtv.ko hasn't been backported for last RHEL kernels AFAIK. Note that if it was done or requested this would make the compat-location pointless. I leave the decition about epel to another reviewer anyway... So to sum-up, if any of the people involved in the EPEL repository accept this package, i have nothing against preventing axel to own epel-4 and epel-5 branches. (just ask and i will request cvs for epel-4 and epel-5 once approved by someone else). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review