Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont - Lite version of the PersonalCopy General Midi soundfont https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430417 ------- Additional Comments From j.w.r.degoede@xxxxxx 2008-02-19 05:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #15) > Sure, generally I like design proposed by Hans in comment #12. I like the idea > of two user groups design, one designed for embedding into other apps and > another patchset for music composers. Good. > I don't like timidity++.cfg creation in %post, where the configuration > would be dependent on random patchset state in /usr/share/soundfonts/. The new > soundfonts really should have virtual provides such as soundfont2 as proposed by > Hans. OKay, I agree that generating timidity++.cfg on the fly isn't pretty. An alternative would be to add virtual provides: soundfont2 to all soundfont packages. But make timidity++ explicitly Requires PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont, and point to that in timidity++.cfg. Advantages: -no ugly kludges to generate /etc/timidity++.cfg -a reasonable default, if we trust on virtual provides only, then the default will become the shortest package Downsides: -people who want to use another soundfont, must still have PersonalCopy-Lite-soundfont installed because of the deps, taking up diskspace I think that given no a days large disks, the downside is survivable and this is a reasonable compromise. Agreed? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review