Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: gnome-doc-utils https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=225816 mbarnes@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED ------- Additional Comments From mbarnes@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-18 11:35 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5) > gnome-doc-utils.src: W: invalid-license GFDL+ Changed to GFDL. > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: no-documentation Fixed some time ago. > gnome-doc-utils.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libxml2-python > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pkgconfig/gnome-doc-utils.pc > gnome-doc-utils-stylesheets.noarch: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package > /usr/share/pkgconfig/xml2po.pc Invalid. See comment #2. > - /usr/share/gnome/help ownership: > Dunno if it would make sense have a different package (like filesystem) to > own this dir rather than yelp if it is problematic to require yelp? Please reopen bug #205799 if this is still an issue. > If GFDL is mentioned as an additional license for the .xml files then I think > LGPL+ should also be mentioned for the .xsl files. Added LGPLv2+. License changes applied to gnome-doc-utils-0.12.1-2.fc9. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review