Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: python-tidy - Python wrapper for tidy, from the HTML tidy project https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=433110 ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From ondrejj@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-17 06:09 EST ------- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > BLOCKER: There is a mix of licenses for source package. You chosen wrong license > > for this package. Please, be careful when setting package license tags. > > Fixed. Not fixed. Where do you see "BSD" in licenses? There is just one LICENSE file which contain MIT license. > The name is correct (as I read this, make most sense too: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#head-8756a3bce652c376d7ba3908461b638784b6952d OK, accepting this. > > Add version for python-devel. uTidylib requires python>=2.3 > > fixed If you are using Requires: python >=2.5, set same version for python-devel > See the fix, it's normal to have several licenses on a package. On IRC guys told me, that public domain do not need to be mentioned here. Just fix the "BSD" to "MIT". You can mention other licenses in comments of .spec file. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review