Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: compat-guichan06 - compatibility package for older guichan release https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432310 ------- Additional Comments From wart@xxxxxxxxxx 2008-02-15 15:16 EST ------- Thanks for the quick check. Here is the updtae that puts the headers in the right place. http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06-0.6.1-4.fc8.src.rpm http://www.kobold.org/~wart/fedora/compat-guichan06.spec I don't understand the reasoning for dropping compat- from the package name. Why is 'compat-' not necessary for packages that provide a -devel subpackage? As far as I know, ballz is the only dependency. I agree that porting ballz would be ideal, but I have not had any time to look at porting, and I know that you've been pretty busy lately, so this compat package seemed the quickest way to work around it. It's probably still a good idea to keep this compat package, however, in case there are any users who have compiled 3rd-party applications against the library on their systems. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review