[Bug 432808] Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: figtoipe - FIG to IPE conversion tool


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432808


orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx    |orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED




------- Additional Comments From orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx  2008-02-14 18:28 EST -------
Well, the BR needs to be zlib-devel, not zlib. 

Also, I'd like to see a copy of the license in the final package.

* source files match upstream:
ea0d1ff62c7c342450fdb0676a2b6192  figtoipe-20071004.tar.gz
ea0d1ff62c7c342450fdb0676a2b6192  figtoipe-20071004.tar.gz.new

* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is correct.
      %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible. 
XXX License text not included in package.
* latest version is being packaged.
X BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock ( ).
* package installs properly
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint is silent.
* final provides and requires are sane:

* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no scriptlets present.
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
* no headers.
* no pkgconfig files.
* no libtool .la droppings.
* not a GUI app.


-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]