Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: libtune - standard API to access the kernel tunables https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=210007 ------- Additional Comments From jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx 2008-02-14 13:46 EST ------- (In reply to comment #75) > > Yes, if it got into only one then there'd be little point. However isn't > > it safer to have a migration path? There'd be a period where an app > > would use both libtune and its own code. Then, once libtune is in both > > Fedora and RHEL, > > Re-read above please. It's *never* going to be in the Fedora base distribution > or RHEL, as the upstream kernel and development community has rejected it > as a way of doing things. By "Fedora base distribution" I believe Bill means it will not be included in a default install or on the release .isos. The package would reside only in the yum repositories and would require uses to explicitly install it. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review